Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41769777›Full record

Observational studyCA: a cancer journal for clinicians

Colorectal cancer statistics, 2026.

Rebecca L Siegel, Nikita Sandeep Wagle, Jessica Star, Tyler B Kratzer, Robert A Smith, Ahmedin Jemal

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rebecca L SiegelSurveillance, Prevention, and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5247-8522
Nikita Sandeep WagleSurveillance, Prevention, and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1337-483X
Jessica StarSurveillance, Prevention, and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3522-9609
Tyler B KratzerSurveillance, Prevention, and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5618-6380
Robert A SmithEarly Cancer Detection Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3344-2238
Ahmedin JemalSurveillance, Prevention, and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cancer-related death in the United States and ranks first in adults younger than 50 years. Every 3 years, the American Cancer Society reports on CRC occurrence based on incidence from population-based cancer registries and mortality from the National Center for Health Statistics. Overall, CRC incidence declined by 0.9% annually during 2013-2022 driven by decreases of 2.5% annually in adults aged 65 years and older. In sharp contrast, incidence rates increased by 3% annually in adults aged 20-49 years and by 0.4% annually in adults aged 50-64 years dominated by tumors in the distal colon and rectum. Consequently, overall rectal cancer incidence increased by 1% annually from 2018 to 2022 after decades of decline and now accounts for 32% of all CRC, up from 27% in the mid-2000s. Increasing CRC incidence in adults aged 50-64 years was confined to regional and distant-stage diagnosis (1.1%-1.3% annually during 2013-2022), likely contributing to an upturn in mortality in this age group of 1% annually since 2019 that was steepest (2.3% annually) in White individuals. Mortality has increased in adults younger than 50 years by 1% annually since 2004, whereas rates have decreased in adults 65 years and older by 2.3% annually since 2012. Despite steady progress for older adults, both CRC incidence and mortality are increasing in adults younger than 65 years who are in the prime of life, underscoring an urgent need for etiologic research to discover the cause of the rising trend. Meanwhile, morbidity and mortality could be mitigated with earlier diagnosis, through screening and educating clinicians and the general public about CRC symptoms, and greater attention to the unique needs of younger patients, including discussion about the preservation of fertility and sexual health.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerSEER ProgramAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge DistributionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMorbidityMortalityUnited StatesYoung Adultcolon and rectum neoplasmsearly onset colorectal cancerepidemiologyhealth disparitiesscreening and early detection

Identifiers

PMID41769777
PMCPMC12951547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.