ArticleMolecular oncology2026
Subtype-specific enhancer RNAs define transcriptional regulators and prognosis in breast cancers.
Article in Molecular oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gene expression is tightly controlled by DNA elements called enhancers by associating with lineage-specific transcription factors. These enhancers transcribe noncoding RNAs (called enhancer RNAs or eRNAs). eRNA expression is an early indicator of transcription factor activity and is associated with treatment response and survival in cancer patients. By analysing ~ 300 000 eRNA loci profiled using RNA-sequencing data sets from 975 breast cancer patients using machine learning approaches, we categorised eRNAs specific to breast cancer molecular subtypes and survival. We associated these eRNAs with subtype-specific mRNAs to define proximal co-expressed regulatory eRNAs (ProxCReAm), which are enriched in pathways characteristic of their respective subtypes. Interestingly, cistrome and transcription factor motif analyses on these eRNAs highlighted involvement of diverse nuclear receptors (GR/AHR for luminal and GR/RAR for basal) and FOX factors in luminal regions. Moreover, luminal eRNAs were associated with better outcomes and Her2 eRNAs with worse outcomes in patients. Overall, we demonstrate that machine learning approaches performed on RNA-seq data sets can classify functionally relevant subtype-specific and prognostic eRNAs, which can identify critical gene pathways and transcription factor networks in breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.