Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41769696›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026

A real-world study of adverse event profiles associated with the four key components of antibody-drug conjugates based on the FAERS database.

Shuning Zhang, Chun Ye, Jiaxuan Zhu, Miao Wang, Yanyan Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shuning ZhangDepartment of Pharmacy, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui, Zhejiang, China.
Chun YeDepartment of Pharmacy, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui, Zhejiang, China.
Jiaxuan ZhuSchool of Pharmacy, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Miao WangSchool of Pharmacy, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yanyan XuDepartment of Pharmacy, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) exhibit structurally driven and highly heterogeneous toxicities, yet most pharmacovigilance studies remain drug-centered and lack systematic component-level evaluation. This study provides a comprehensive real-world safety assessment of FDA-approved ADCs using a component-based analytical framework. Methods: All adverse event (AE) reports for 14 FDA-approved ADCs (2004-2024) were extracted from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). ADCs and AEs were included when positive signals were simultaneously detected by four disproportionality methods (reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), information component (IC), and empirical Bayes geometric mean (EBGM)) under a multi-method consensus criterion (MCC). AEs were classified using MedDRA at the preferred term (PT) and system organ class (SOC) levels. Signal prioritization was performed by ranking ROR values within each key component type-antibody subtype, linker type, payload category, and drug-to-antibody ratio (DAR) value class, with the top 20 signals designated as "strong signals." False discovery rate (FDR) correction was applied for sensitivity analysis. Results: A total of 52,699 positive PT-level AE signals were included across 13 ADCs. Distinct toxicity signatures were observed across component types: IgG1-based ADCs demonstrated prominent ocular and corneal toxicity and treatment-related secondary lymphoma, whereas IgG4-based ADCs were dominated by hepatobiliary injury, vascular toxicity, bone marrow suppression, and severe infections. ADCs with cleavable linkers showed toxicity patterns enriched for treatment-related secondary lymphoma, pulmonary toxicity, and infections, while non-cleavable linker ADCs showed a highly distinctive pattern dominated by ocular toxicity, particularly corneal epithelial and stromal injury. DNA-damaging payload ADCs exhibited severe systemic toxicities, including hepatobiliary toxicity, vascular injury, interstitial lung disease, serious infections, and bone marrow suppression. In contrast, microtubule inhibitor payloads mainly produced ocular and corneal toxicity, treatment-related secondary lymphoma, and local hemorrhagic events. DAR 3-5 ADCs were highly enriched for ocular toxicity and treatment-related secondary lymphoma; DAR < 3 ADCs were characterized by hepatobiliary injury and infection-dominant patterns, and DAR > 5 ADCs demonstrated a heterogeneous multi-organ toxicity profile spanning metabolic, hepatic, pulmonary, infectious, neurological, vascular, and ocular domains. All MCC-identified PT-level AE signals remained significant after FDR correction. Conclusion: This large-scale real-world evaluation reveals clear component type-specific toxicity signatures among ADCs, supporting more targeted safety monitoring and informing rational ADC design.

Indexed as

antibody–drug conjugatescomponent type-specific toxicitydrug-to-antibody ratiofood and drug administration adverse event reporting systemhepatobiliary toxicityocular toxicitypharmacovigilance

Identifiers

PMID41769696
PMCPMC12946140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.