Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41769664›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in nutrition2026

U.S. consumer acceptance of whole grains, local grains, and alternative grain networks: a scoping review.

Rebekah Schulz, Hikaru Peterson, Hallie Lundquist, Megan Kocher, Len Marquart

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rebekah SchulzUniversity of Minnesota Twin Cities, St. Paul, MN, United States.
Hikaru PetersonUniversity of Minnesota Twin Cities, St. Paul, MN, United States.
Hallie LundquistUniversity of Minnesota Twin Cities, St. Paul, MN, United States.
Megan KocherUniversity of Minnesota Twin Cities, St. Paul, MN, United States.
Len MarquartUniversity of Minnesota Twin Cities, St. Paul, MN, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Whole grains, including pseudocereals, provide a dual benefit: they support human health and disease prevention and strengthen agronomic and ecosystem functions through crop rotations. Despite numerous epidemiological and intervention studies indicating their health promotion and disease prevention benefits, however, only one percent of U.S. children and eight percent of U.S. adults meet actual whole grain intake recommendations. Recently, alternative grain networks as a type of grain system are emerging in the U.S., with a vision of offering local grain products to consumers not only for their benefit but also for that of the entire grain value chain. Methods: The aim of this scoping review is to map existing literature on U.S. consumer acceptance of whole grains, local grains, and alternative grain networks, define knowledge gaps, and make recommendations for future research. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we systematically screened 14,155 articles, 32 of which met our inclusion criteria. Results and discussion: The included studies were methodologically heterogeneous, spanning randomized control trials, surveys, observational studies, and qualitative methodologies. The studies examined whole grains, bread, organic grain products, local grain products, and specific grain products. Due to most of the included studies' focus on whole grains, the main focus of the scoping review is on whole grains. Collectively, the studies most frequently reported on the following key factors impacting consumer acceptance of whole grains: taste, price, knowledge, familiarity, attitude, and income/food insecurity. Many of the identified barriers and drivers to whole grain intake were similar to those in most other countries. Three articles examined consumer acceptance of alternative grain networks and local grain products. These articles, all using a qualitative, case study methodology, indicated that a select segment of consumers are interested in these systems and products, without quantitative measurement of consumer acceptance. The results of this scoping review suggest that educational campaigns such as those focused on whole grain identification, whole and local grain health and environmental benefits, preparation techniques and recipes, community cooking classes and sampling events, and policy and research advances along the grain supply chain could aid in promoting consumer acceptance of whole grains, local grains, and alternative grain networks.

Indexed as

alternative grain networksconsumer acceptanceconsumerslocal grain economieslocal grainsregional grain networkswhole grains

Identifiers

PMID41769664
PMCPMC12947702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.