SynthesisFrontiers in nutrition2026
The role of policy on fortification in food processing and value addition in Malawi and Mozambique-a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Evidence to Action: Addressing Micronutrient Gaps among Women of Reproductive Age in Malawi Using the Comprehensive Nutrient Gap Assessment Framework.Current developments in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Food fortification is a public health strategy for tackling micronutrient deficiencies in sub-Saharan Africa. This systematic review explores the policies governing food fortification in Malawi and Mozambique. By comparing policy implementation, regulatory mechanisms and outcomes, this review aims to identify best practices, challenges, and opportunities to strengthen fortification programs across the region. All applicable evidence collated from reports and articles published between 2000 and 2025, databases from key organizations, and reports/literature received from key informants were systematically reviewed. A total of 29 reports were selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria and subjected to risk of bias assessment. The key issues include high fortification costs, lack of technical knowledge and expertise, equipment limitations, quality control issues and regulatory compliance. Malawi's mandatory fortification, enacted in 2011, has demonstrated higher compliance rates, supported by robust monitoring mechanisms, albeit with limited reach into informal food processing sectors that serve rural populations. Mozambique's voluntary fortification guidelines, which became mandatory in 2016, exhibit lower compliance but greater flexibility in accommodating small and medium-scale processors. This review recommends monitoring quality and reporting, results-based implementation, stakeholder and community engagement, support and incentives to the food industries, and reduction of bureaucratic burdens to achieve effective fortification programs. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251113300, identifier PROSPERO (CRD420251113300).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.