ReviewCureus2026
A Narrative Review of Long-Term Outcomes and Imaging-Based Failure Analysis in Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) remains an underutilized treatment option for isolated lateral compartment osteoarthritis, despite growing evidence supporting its effectiveness. Historically, concerns regarding technical complexity, implant design limitations, and higher revision rates limited its adoption. However, advances in implant technology and surgical techniques have substantially improved outcomes. We conducted a comprehensive literature search for studies including outcomes of UKA. Inclusion prioritized but was not limited to studies published in 2020 and onwards, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and clinical trials. We summarized the available literature on long-term clinical outcomes, survivorship, and failure patterns following lateral UKA, with particular emphasis on the role of imaging-based failure analysis. Contemporary cohort studies and registry data demonstrate excellent survivorship at long-term follow-up comparable to medial UKA and, in appropriately selected patients, total knee arthroplasty. Imaging modalities, including radiography, computed tomography, fluoroscopy-based kinematic analysis, and magnetic resonance imaging, play a critical role in evaluating component positioning and alignment, along with early signs of failure that may not be clinically apparent. These imaging-based assessments have contributed to refinements in surgical planning and patient selection. Overall, modern lateral UKA has evolved into a reliable and durable procedure when performed with meticulous techniques and appropriate imaging-guided evaluation, supporting its expanded role in contemporary knee arthroplasty practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.