Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41769592›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Optimising Mental Health Care for People With Neurological Conditions in the UK: Evidence-Based Models for Integrated Neuropsychiatric Services.

Naireen Asim, Al Mahdin Ornob Miah

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Naireen AsimGeriatrics, Surrey and Sussex Healthcare Trust, London, GBR.
Al Mahdin Ornob MiahHospital Medicine, Barts Health Trust, London, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuropsychiatry bridges neurology and psychiatry by addressing mental health symptoms arising from brain disorders. Psychiatric comorbidities are common in neurological conditions, yet access to appropriate mental health care in the UK remains fragmented. This review evaluates the evidence for current UK neuropsychiatric service models and explores strategies to improve integration and access. A targeted narrative review of MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Embase (2000-2025) examined studies evaluating neuropsychiatric service models, including outcomes such as access, cost-effectiveness, patient outcomes, and clinician perspectives. Citation tracking was used to identify seminal models, including Sharpe's integrated approach. While liaison psychiatry services are present in over 90% of UK hospitals with emergency departments, many fall short of recommended staffing and capacity. Specialist inpatient neuropsychiatry units improve outcomes through multidisciplinary care but are geographically limited. Integrated neuropsychiatry services, such as the Oxford model, show the greatest clinical and economic promise by embedding psychiatry within neuroscience teams, though scalability is constrained by workforce shortages, fragmented commissioning, and inconsistent evaluation. Integrated care offers the most effective means of addressing neuropsychiatric need. Achieving equitable access will require workforce expansion, cross-specialty training, unified funding mechanisms, and robust evaluation to ensure consistent, evidence-based care across the UK.

Indexed as

health service modelsinpatient servicesintegrated careliaison psychiatrymental health servicesmultidisciplinary careneurological disordersneuropsychiatrypsychiatric comorbidityunited kingdom

Identifiers

PMID41769592
PMCPMC12949531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.