Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41769575›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Determinants of Cancer Screening in India: An Epidemiological Overview.

Vijna, Dharmendra Kumar Dubey, Pramod Mishra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

VijnaDepartment of Community Medicine, Baba Kinaram Autonomous State Medical College, Chandauli, IND.
Dharmendra Kumar DubeyDepartment of Community Medicine, Baba Kinaram Autonomous State Medical College, Chandauli, IND.
Pramod MishraDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Padmini Care Hospital, Dhaneswar Rath Institute of Engineering and Management Studies (DRIEMS) University, Tangi, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNoncommunicable diseases (NCDs) have emerged as a major global health burden. Among these, cancer is the second leading cause of mortality worldwide and accounts for a substantial proportion of deaths in India. This study aimed to evaluate state-specific disparities in breast, cervical, and oral cancer screening coverage and to identify determinants of cancer screening patterns. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Data relevant to the study objectives were obtained from the fifth National Family Health Survey, which follows a cross-sectional study design. For analysis, only women aged 15-49 years were included. The primary outcomes of interest were self-reported screening behaviors for cervical, breast, and oral cancers. Responses were dichotomized as "yes" (screened) or "no" (not screened). Three separate models, each focusing on a distinct set of independent variables, were used to assess determinants of cancer screening behavior. Associations between outcome and predictor variables were examined using chi-square tests. Logistic regression models were used to estimate the likelihood of undergoing various cancer screening tests in relation to selected independent variables.

resultsThis study revealed alarmingly low cancer screening rates in India. At the national level, only 1.2% (n = 2,642) of women reported screening for cervical cancer, 0.6% (n = 1,421) for oral cancer, and 0.5% (n = 1,230) for breast cancer.

conclusionsExposure to health-related messages through television and radio was positively associated with cancer screening uptake. Higher body mass index and the spouse's educational status were also positive predictors of screening participation. In contrast, high parity, current breastfeeding status, and rural residence were associated with lower screening uptake. The history of terminated pregnancy, employment status, and exposure to print media were not significant influencers. To address sociodemographic disparities in screening coverage, targeted interventions, such as mobile screening units in underserved rural areas, strengthened primary healthcare services, and community-based outreach through frontline health workers, should be prioritized. Additionally, culturally tailored awareness campaigns and strengthened referral linkages may further enhance screening uptake among disadvantaged populations.

Indexed as

breast cancercancer screeningcervical cancerindianfhs

Identifiers

PMID41769575
PMCPMC12936147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.