Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41769558›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Atypical Oscillating Pupillary Reaction in a Brainstem-Dead Patient.

Mohamed Foda Hendi, Zeyad Faoor Medhat Alrais, Fahimuddin Syed, Ghaya Z Alrais, Mohamed H Elkhouly

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mohamed Foda HendiIntensive Care Unit, Rashid Hospital, Dubai, ARE.
Zeyad Faoor Medhat AlraisIntensive Care Unit, Rashid Hospital, Dubai, ARE.
Fahimuddin SyedIntensive Care Unit, Rashid Hospital, Dubai, ARE.
Ghaya Z AlraisNeurological Surgery, Dubai Medical College, Dubai, ARE.
Mohamed H ElkhoulyIntern, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, ARE.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dilated and fixed pupils are a hallmark of the diagnosis of brainstem death. We present a case of a brain-dead patient whose pupil displayed unilateral spontaneous repetitive pupillary dilatation and constriction (in an oscillating manner) independent of external stimuli, which didn't respond to light. Central causes of this phenomenon were excluded by confirmation of brainstem death via ancillary test, leaving the peripheral cause as the most likely explanation. This rare and atypical phenomenon is not a sign of brain activity and can be explained that the pupillary constrictor muscle can become hypersensitive after brain death, and it can be spontaneously constricted or dilated in response to circulating neurotransmitters in the blood. Also, the cilio-spinal reflex may be caused in brain-dead patients due to terminal neural discharges from dying cells, which lead to sympathetic stimulation of the ciliary ganglion. This case shows that oscillating pupillary activity in the absence of external stimuli should not interfere with or delay the diagnosis of brainstem death to facilitate earlier organ donation. An oscillating spontaneous pupillary activity in a brain-dead patient is a rare, atypical phenomenon caused by a peripheral reflex rather than a central reflex. This atypical phenomenon should not interfere with or delay the diagnosis of brainstem death, which allows for proper and timely medical care and organ donation.

Indexed as

brain deathbrainstem reflexeseeg (electroencephalogram)organ donationpupillary light reflex

Identifiers

PMID41769558
PMCPMC12947951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.