ArticleCureus2026
Bayesian Re-analysis of Two-Year Outcomes in the Platelet-Rich Plasma in Achilles Tendon Healing 2 (PATH-2) Trial: Platelet-Rich Plasma for Achilles Tendon Rupture.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Patient-Centered Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Internal Splinting Versus Open Achilles Tendon Repair: Comparable Clinically Meaningful Recovery at 12 Months.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The platelet-rich plasma in achilles tendon healing 2 (PATH-2) trial is the largest randomized study of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in acute Achilles tendon rupture. While the original frequentist analysis showed no significant benefit, such methods cannot quantify the probability of clinically meaningful improvement. We conducted a Bayesian re-analysis of PATH-2 data (n = 177) with Achilles tendon total rupture score (ATRS) and patient-specific functional scale (PSFS) at 24 months as outcomes. Minimally clinically important differences (MCIDs) were defined as 8 ATRS points and 2.3 PSFS points. Across flat, neutral, optimistic, and pessimistic priors, posterior probabilities of PRP providing benefit ≥MCID were <0.001% for ATRS and ~5×10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.