ArticleCureus2026
Pericardial-Drain-to-Central-Venous-Line Return to Rescue Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Flow in Tamponade From Stanford Type A Dissection: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac tamponade secondary to Stanford type A aortic dissection carries extremely high mortality, and pericardiocentesis may precipitate catastrophic hemorrhage; during extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), elevated pericardial pressure can further impair venous return and limit venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) flow. An 87-year-old woman suffered cardiac arrest due to tamponade from Stanford type A dissection and underwent ECPR, but venous drainage was severely compromised, and ECMO flow remained low (1.5-2.0 L/minute). Echocardiography showed progressive pericardial effusion, and pericardial drainage produced high-pressure bloody output consistent with ongoing rupture. As a rescue maneuver to maintain systemic perfusion, the pericardial drain was connected to a central venous line via an interposed syringe to reinfuse pericardial effluent into the venous circulation, improving ECMO flow to 2.5-2.8 L/minute and stabilizing hemodynamics long enough to proceed to surgical repair; computed tomography confirmed Stanford type A dissection. The patient underwent a bio-Bentall procedure but died of refractory coagulopathy and bleeding on postoperative day 2. Reinfusion of pericardial effluent into the central venous system may transiently restore venous return and stabilize ECMO flow in tamponade complicating Stanford type A dissection during ECPR and should be considered only as a high-risk, last-resort bridge under continuous hemodynamic and circuit monitoring until definitive surgical correction is achieved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.