ArticleCureus2026
Post-traumatic Carotid-Cavernous Fistula Following Penetrating Orbital Injury: A Case Report and Literature Review.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Posttraumatic carotid-cavernous fistulas (CCFs) are rare but potentially sight-threatening vascular lesions, most commonly associated with high-energy craniofacial trauma. Direct high-flow CCFs following penetrating orbital injury are exceptionally uncommon and may present with delayed or misleading clinical features. This report describes the case of a 35-year-old homeless man who presented with a two-month history of progressive left orbital symptoms after a knife-inflicted injury. Initial treatment targeted a presumed infectious process; however, persistent proptosis, ocular pain, mydriasis, complete visual loss, and ophthalmoplegia prompted further evaluation. CT angiography, performed due to a contraindication to MRI, demonstrated a direct high-flow left CCF with marked dilation of the cavernous sinus and superior ophthalmic vein. Digital subtraction angiography confirmed a Barrow type A CCF. The patient underwent staged endovascular therapy. Initial transarterial coil embolization achieved approximately 80% occlusion, with partial improvement in proptosis but persistent visual impairment. Follow-up angiography revealed residual shunting, leading to a second-stage covered stent angioplasty. Despite this, residual flow persisted, and a third endovascular procedure was planned. The third-stage intervention was canceled because of inadequate social support, and the patient was discharged prematurely and lost to follow-up. CCFs are rare entities but should be strongly suspected in cases of penetrating ocular trauma associated with proptosis, chemosis, and orbital bruits. One of the most important determinants of visual prognosis is timely diagnosis and prompt management of these lesions. In the present case, the patient's social vulnerability contributed to delayed recognition and treatment, resulting in complete loss of vision. Furthermore, the patient's social circumstances directly limited completion of the planned therapeutic strategy. Thus, social vulnerability emerged as a key determinant of prognosis, influencing both clinical outcomes and access to definitive care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.