Improving Braden Scale Documentation for Pressure-Injury Risk Assessment: A Closed-Loop Clinical Audit at Dongola Specialized Hospital.

backgroundPressure injuries remain a significant and largely preventable cause of morbidity among hospitalized patients. Accurate and complete risk assessment using validated tools such as the Braden Scale is fundamental to effective prevention; however, documentation practices are often inconsistent, particularly in resource-limited settings.

objectiveTo evaluate the completeness of Braden Scale documentation in the Internal Medicine Department at Dongola Specialized Hospital and to assess the impact of a targeted quality-improvement intervention through a closed-loop clinical audit.

methodsA prospective closed-loop clinical audit was conducted over two cycles, each reviewing 51 patient records. Baseline documentation practices (Cycle 1) were assessed against predefined standards derived from international pressure-injury prevention guidelines. Following a structured two-month intervention comprising staff education, reinforcement of documentation expectations, and introduction of a standardized Braden documentation form, a second audit cycle (Cycle 2) was performed using identical criteria. Documentation completeness was analyzed using descriptive statistics, and differences between cycles were assessed using chi-square tests.

resultsAt baseline, none of the Braden subscale scores, total scores, risk levels, or preventive actions were documented. Following the intervention, documentation of all six Braden subscales improved to near-universal completion (96.4-100%). Documentation of total Braden score, risk level, and preventive actions increased to 89.1%, 83.6%, and 89.1%, respectively (all p < 0.001). Significant improvements were also observed in consultant identification and bed number documentation. Conversely, completion rates for certain demographic fields, particularly hospital number and admission date, declined in Cycle 2.

conclusionThis audit demonstrates that targeted education and standardized documentation tools can lead to substantial and statistically significant improvements in Braden Scale documentation. While clinical risk assessment practices improved markedly, persistent gaps in administrative documentation highlight the need for sustained monitoring and system-level reinforcement. Closed-loop clinical audits represent an effective strategy for strengthening pressure-injury risk assessment practices in hospital settings.