Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41769246›Full record

ArticleResearch on social work practice2023

Qualitative System Dynamics Modeling to Support Community Planning in Opioid Overdose Prevention.

Nasim S Sabounchi, David W Lounsbury, Pulwasha Iftikhar, Priscila Lutete, Biljana Trajkoska, Weanne Myrrh Estrada, Nabila El-Bassel, Bruce Rapkin, Louisa Gilbert, Timothy Hunt and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research on social work practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Nasim S SabounchiCenter for Systems and Community Design, Department of Health Policy and Management, Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8027-8779
David W LounsburyDepartment of Epidemiology & Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Pulwasha IftikharCenter for Systems and Community Design, Department of Health Policy and Management, Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Priscila LuteteCenter for Systems and Community Design, Department of Health Policy and Management, Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Biljana TrajkoskaCenter for Systems and Community Design, Department of Health Policy and Management, Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Weanne Myrrh EstradaCenter for Systems and Community Design, Department of Health Policy and Management, Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Nabila El-BasselSocial Intervention Group, School of Social Work, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0049-5686
Bruce RapkinDepartment of Epidemiology & Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Louisa GilbertSocial Intervention Group, School of Social Work, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2715-8310
Timothy HuntSocial Intervention Group, School of Social Work, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Dawn A Goddard-EckrichSocial Intervention Group, School of Social Work, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3456-2322
Daniel J FeasterDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Terry T-K HuangCenter for Systems and Community Design, Department of Health Policy and Management, Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

CHASE: An Innovative County-Level Public Health Response to the Opioid Epidemic in New York StateUM1DA049415 · NIDA · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI EL-BASSEL, NABILA, GILBERT, LOUISA · 2019 to 2023
$77.3M
Training Program on HIV and Substance Use in the Criminal Justice SystemT32DA037801 · NIDA · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI Nabila El-Bassel, Lisa R Metsch · 2014 to 2026
$5.7M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP006848NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA037801NIDA NIH HHS UM1 DA049415
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to help community stakeholders develop a shared understanding of the opioid crisis through qualitative system dynamics (SD) modeling to inform local strategies for prevention and treatment. Methods: As part of the HEALing Communities Study-New York State, we used secondary qualitative data from community stakeholder interviews and coalition meeting notes to develop qualitative SD models that elucidate the interdependencies and feedback structures underlying the opioid epidemic in each community. Results: The synthesized model revealed multiple balancing and reinforcing feedback loops that influenced the adoption and reach of evidence-based practices to reduce opioid overdose and fatality. Conclusion: SD modeling is a novel approach to helping community stakeholders to see the inter-connectedness of actors, factors and sectors and the need for multiple mutually reinforcing strategies to avert opioid overdose and fatality. Social workers could play a key role in linking actions across sectors in such a complex system.

Indexed as

community action planningopioid overdosesystem dynamics modeling

Identifiers

PMID41769246
PMCPMC12945345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.