ReviewJournal of children's orthopaedics2026
Virtual reality as a distraction technique in pediatric patients undergoing orthopedic procedures: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Review in Journal of children's orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07740980 (Does Virtual Reality Reduce Pain, Fear, and Behavioral Distress in Children During Burn Dressing Changes? A Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Does Virtual Reality Reduce Pain, Fear, and Behavioral Distress in Children During Burn Dressing Changes? A Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immersive Virtual Reality for Pediatric Procedural Pain and Anxiety: A Structured Narrative Review and Developmentally Informed Framework for Clinical Matching and AI-Supported Personalization.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Review
- Virtual Reality as an Anxiolytic and Analgesic in Interventional Radiology Procedures: An Evidence-Based Review and Practical Framework.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Pain and anxiety are common in pediatric orthopedic procedures such as cast or pin removal, often leading to distress and physiological stress responses. Virtual reality (VR) offers immersive distraction and has shown promise in pediatric procedural care; however, evidence in orthopedic procedures remains limited. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of VR compared with standard care in reducing pain, anxiety, and heart rate in children undergoing orthopedic procedures. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library from inception to 20 October 2025 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing VR distraction and standard care in pediatric patients undergoing orthopedic procedures. Outcomes of interest included pain, anxiety, and heart rate. Statistical analysis was performed with R 4.3.1. Standardized mean differences (SMD) using the Inverse-Variance method and the random-effects method. Results: A total of four RCTs were included in the final meta-analysis, comprising 624 patients, of whom 315 (50%) were distracted with VR during clinical orthopedic procedures (mean age 9.84 years, mean 40% females). In the pooled analysis, VR distraction significantly reduced anxiety (SMD = -0.55, 95% confidence intervals (CI) [-0.76, -0.34]; Conclusion: In this meta-analysis of four RCTs including 624 pediatric patients, VR distraction reduced procedural anxiety and, in pooled analyses, was associated with modest but statistically significant reductions in pain and heart rate compared with standard care during predominantly cast-related orthopedic clinic procedures. The integration of this child-friendly, nonpharmacological approach provides enhanced procedural comfort and effective anxiety management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.