ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2026
Learning to simulate realistic human diffuse reflectance spectra.
Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Significance: Hyperspectral imaging is a noninvasive, cost-effective modality with transformative clinical potential. Its adoption is limited by the lack of accurate and efficient methods that relate spectra to tissue parameters, essential for both AI training and validation of imaging methods, as gold standard Monte Carlo (MC) simulations remain prohibitively computationally expensive. Aim: We aim to develop a scalable and accurate method for generating realistic tissue reflectance spectra in support of AI development and validation in biomedical imaging. Approach: We trained a general-purpose neural surrogate model on Results: The surrogate model achieved accuracy matching MC simulations with 5-10 million photons while delivering inference five orders of magnitude faster. Across 140 million human tissue spectra, it improved spectral recall by 13-48 percentage points over existing surrogate models. Scaling analyses revealed a power law relationship between training dataset size and test error, enabling the prediction of training data requirements for target accuracy. Our porcine study suggests that the synthetic data generated with the surrogate model is suitable for recovering organ-specific Conclusion: Neural surrogate models can achieve MC-level accuracy and
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.