ReviewFrontiers in public health2026
Current state of geriatric services in Georgia: education, policy gaps, and recommendations.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Georgia, an upper-middle-income country in the South Caucasus, is experiencing a rapid demographic shift toward an older population. Despite improvements in life expectancy and reductions in mortality, the healthcare system remains underprepared to address the complex medical and social needs of older adults. Methods: This mini-review synthesizes available information on geriatric education, workforce capacity, service provision, and the current state of geriatric research in Georgia. Findings are compared with neighboring countries and selected high-income European nations with established geriatric care systems, including hospital wards, outpatient clinics, and community-based programs. Results: Geriatric services in Georgia are limited. Medical education provides minimal exposure to geriatrics, postgraduate training is scarce, and dedicated hospital-based geriatric departments are largely absent. Nursing programs include basic geriatric modules, while short-term "Geriatric Assistant" courses offer practical skills for older adults care. Research focusing on older adults is sparse. In contrast, Germany, France, the Netherlands, and Nordic countries maintain well-structured, multidisciplinary hospital and community geriatric services supported by formal education, continuous professional development, and active research networks. Regional neighbors vary, with Turkey showing the most comprehensive system, and Armenia and Azerbaijan in early stages of development. Conclusion: Georgia urgently needs to integrate geriatrics into national health policy, strengthen workforce education, establish hospital and community geriatric services, and foster locally generated research. Learning from international models and aligning with frameworks such as the WHO Decade of Healthy Ageing can guide the development of a sustainable, patient-centered geriatric care system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.