ArticleJNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association2025
Reliability and Validity of a Nepali Language Version of the Caregiver Knowledge of Child Development Inventory: A Mixed Method Study.
Article in JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The term "child development" describes the changes a child goes through from birth to adulthood in terms of their physical, linguistic, cognitive, emotional, and other development. Parents, caretakers, and family all have an important effect on it, especially during the first two years. The study aims to translate and analyze the psychometric properties of the English version of the (Caregiver Knowledge of Child Development Inventory (CKCDI) into the Nepali version (CKCDI-N) for mothers of children under two years old. Methods: This was a cross-section validation study carried out in Kageshwori Manohara Municipality from April 2024 to August 2024. Mothers with children under two years were randomly selected for the study. In first part tools were translated and cross-cultural adaptation was done by focused group discussion. This was followed by psychometric evaluation where Cronbach's alpha, factor analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis were used. Results: The content validation indicated the use of a reliable test with a Cronbach alpha of 0.704 for developing skills and 0.705 for developmental stimulation. The original CFA model had poor fit, but the updated model had a fair fit after correlating seven error term pairs. Factor loadings were over 0.50 for every item, and the diagonal values representing AVE square roots were greater than other correlation values. Conclusions: This reliability and validity of the Nepali Version of CKCDI-N showed that every item displayed as acceptable, and the internal consistency was also satisfactory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.