Observational studyJNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association2025
Prevalence of Surgical Glove Perforation in Orthopedic Surgery at Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital: An Observational Study.
Observational study in JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Gloves provide a physical barrier preventing cross-infection between the operating team members and the patient. However, there is always a chance of the gloves perforating and breaching this barrier. This study attempts to understand the prevalence of perforation of surgical gloves in orthopedic surgery at Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital. Methods: This was an observational cross-sectional study carried out over three months. Gloves from the chief and first assistant surgeons were checked for visible perforation and occult perforation by water leak test. The type of surgery, hand dominance, duration of surgery, time during surgery when perforation occurred, and area of glove perforation were noted. Operative perforation rate, Overall glove perforation, and Operative perforation based on type of surgery, and duration of surgery were calculated. The categorical variables obtained were summarized with frequency and percentage. Results: A total of 166 cases were included in the study. The operative perforation rate was 79 (47.59%; 95% CI: 39.80-55.47%) and the overall glove perforation was 117 (8.81%). Trauma surgery was the most common surgery performed during this study 111 (66.86%) and 56 (50.45%) of trauma surgery cases had glove perforation. Glove perforation was noticed by 25 (43.85%) of chief surgeon during surgery, out of which 11 (44%) of it was between 0.5 to 1 hour. Similarly, 20 (50%) of assistant surgeon noticed glove perforation during surgery, out of which 9 (45%) of it was between 1 to 1.5 hour after starting the surgery. Conclusions: Perforations of the surgical gloves was comparable to other published literature. Trauma surgery was the most common.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.