Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41768985›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2026

Mental health treatment among transgender and gender diverse people following gender affirming hormone therapy: evidence from whole-of-population Australian administrative data.

Karinna Saxby, Tom Buchmueller, Christopher S Carpenter, Clue Coman, Brendan J Nolan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Karinna SaxbyMelbourne Institute: Applied Economic & Social Research, Faculty of Business and Economics, Room 5.55, Level 5, FBE Building, 111 Barry Street, Carlton, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia.
Tom BuchmuellerRoss School of Business, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, United States.
Christopher S CarpenterDepartment of Economics and Vanderbilt LGBTQ+ Policy Lab, Vanderbilt University, United States.
Clue ComanCentre for Social Research in Health, University of New South Wales, New South Wales, Australia.
Brendan J NolanTrans Health Research Group, Medicine (Austin Health), University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Gender affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) is associated with improved mental health outcomes among transgender and gender diverse ('trans') individuals, yet limited evidence examines how mental healthcare utilisation changes following GAHT initiation. Methods: Using Australian administrative data (2012-2024), we identified trans people initiating oestradiol-based GAHT (e-GAHT) or testosterone-based GAHT (t-GAHT). We applied a dynamic difference-in-differences model to estimate within-individual changes in mental health services and prescriptions (antidepressants, anxiolytics), using future GAHT recipients as controls. Effects were estimated separately by regimen and relative to individuals' utilisation three years before GAHT initiation, up to five years post-initiation, and stratified by age (15-24, ≥25 years) and baseline mental healthcare engagement (above/below mean mental health prescription use). Findings: 20,358 individuals initiated e-GAHT and 11,883 initiated t-GAHT (mean follow-up 4.1 and 4.9 years, respectively). Prior to initiation, e-GAHT recipients had lower engagement with mental healthcare than t-GAHT recipients. For both regimens, mental healthcare use rose at initiation but declined sharply thereafter, with larger initial increases for e-GAHT recipients. Five years post-initiation, e-GAHT and t-GAHT recipients used 0.29 (95% CI -0.03; 0.60) and 2.59 (95% CI 1.87; 3.31) fewer mental health services, respectively. Mental health prescription use among e-GAHT recipients initially rose and then fell to 0.53 (95% CI 0.20; 0.86) at five years, while t-GAHT recipients used 1.02 (95% CI 0.31; 1.72) fewer prescriptions after five years. Reductions in mental healthcare were more pronounced for individuals with higher baseline mental healthcare engagement as well as older e-GAHT recipients. Interpretation: Consistent with assessment and support requirements, mental healthcare use increases around the time of GAHT initiation-particularly among individuals with limited prior mental healthcare engagement and younger e-GAHT recipients-then declines substantially over time. Altogether GAHT may help address unmet mental health needs and contribute to longer-term reductions in mental healthcare use and associated costs among trans people. Funding: This work is supported by the University of Melbourne McKenzie Fellowship (2025MCK182), a Viertel Charitable Foundation Clinical Investigator Award, and a National Health and Medical Research Council Investigator Grant (2034450).

Indexed as

AntidepressantsGender affirming hormone therapyMental healthMental healthcareTransgender

Identifiers

PMID41768985
PMCPMC12947644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.