ReviewEJVES vascular forum2026
Systematic Review of Renal Outcomes and Procedural Efficacy of Carbon Dioxide Digital Subtraction Angiography in Endovascular Aortic Repair.
Review in EJVES vascular forum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Carbon dioxide (CO Data Sources: Systematic searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library for studies published up to December 2024 reporting the use of CO Review Methods: The review was registered prospectively in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database (CRD42024580889). All papers reporting the use of CO Results: Of the 108 articles initially identified, 16 studies published between 2007 and 2024 met the inclusion criteria, reporting data on 901 patients (mean age 76 years; 89.1% men) undergoing EVAR with CO Conclusion: The use of CO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.