ArticleFrontiers in radiology2026
Automated segmentation and classification of lumbar transverse ultrasound views using a two-stage deep learning method.
Article in Frontiers in radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ultrasound guidance is widely used in lumbar regional anesthesia and chronic pain management because it provides radiation-free, portable, and real-time visualization. Among lumbar ultrasound views, the paramedian transverse view at the transverse process (PTV-TP) and the paramedian transverse foraminal view (PTFV) are essential for procedures such as lumbar plexus blocks and transforaminal injections. However, reliable recognition of these views remains technically challenging, particularly for novice clinicians. Objective: This study aimed to develop and evaluate a deep learning-based two-stage framework for automated detection and classification of PTV-TP and PTFV in lumbar ultrasound images. Methods: Ultrasound images were collected from 425 patients undergoing pain treatment at Peking Union Medical College Hospital. The proposed framework consisted of two stages. First, a U-Net-based semantic segmentation model was used to identify key lumbar anatomical landmarks, namely the transverse process and intervertebral foramen, which were grouped into a single class to reduce annotation complexity and improve robustness. Second, coordinate-based spatial features were extracted from the segmentation masks and classified using a support vector machine (SVM) to distinguish between PTV-TP and PTFV views. An end-to-end CNN-based classifier trained under the same experimental protocol served as a comparison. Segmentation performance was evaluated using the intersection-over-union (IoU) metric, and classification performance was assessed using accuracy. Results: The proposed U-Net-based segmentation achieved an IoU of 83.21%, outperforming conventional multi-class U-Net segmentation (77.33%). Based on the segmentation results, the coordinate-based SVM classifier achieved an accuracy of 97.66% in differentiating PTV-TP and PTFV views, which was substantially higher than that of the end-to-end CNN classifier (85.00%). Visualization results demonstrated stable performance across representative ultrasound images, including challenging imaging conditions. Conclusion: The proposed two-stage framework, which integrates semantic segmentation with coordinate-based classification, enables accurate automated recognition of lumbar ultrasound views. By explicitly modeling key anatomical landmarks and their spatial relationships, this approach reduces reliance on operator experience and may support safer and more efficient ultrasound-guided lumbar procedures. Future work will focus on expanding the dataset and validating the generalizability of the method across diverse clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.