Observational studyJNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association2025
Contextual Adaptation, Translation, and Validation of the Affiliate Stigma Scale among Primary Caregivers of Children with Physical Disabilities in Nepal: An Observational Study.
Observational study in JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The experience of affiliate stigma can cause psychosocial problems among caregivers of children with physical disabilities, seriously affecting children's care and rehabilitation. To measure this stigma, we aimed to adapt and validate the widely accepted Affiliate Stigma Scale in the Nepali language. Methods: This study was conducted among 220 primary caregivers of children with physical disabilities, who presented at the Hospital and Rehabilitation Centre for Disabled Children, Nepal, from April to June 2024. The original tool was adapted, translated, followed by experts' reviews, and pretesting. The final Nepali version was then administered among conveniently selected participants through face-to-face interviews. Data analyses comprised different parts, including item analysis, reliability, validity analysis, and Exploratory Factor Analysis, performed using SPSS version 16. Results: Item analyses revealed strong item-total correlations (r=0.31-0.76) for all 21 items except A3 (r=0.23). Critical Ratios indicated high discriminative power (CRs>0.30) for all items. The reliability test showed a strong Cronbach's alpha coefficient (0.90), and odd-even split-half reliability (0.83 and 0.80). The tool exhibits good discriminative validity (p=0.04), and high convergent validity (r=-0.33, p<0.00). Moreover, exploratory factor analysis results supported the three-factor structure of the original scale, though some issues were identified: item A3 not loading onto any of the three factors, some cross-loadings, and items from different domains grouping together. Conclusions: Despite having the problematic structure of the scale, it was still found highly reliable and valid in measuring affiliate stigma among the study population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.