ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
Associations of economic vulnerability and food insecurity with the Planetary Health Diet in children: PASE study (Brazil).
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/objectives: This study investigated the associations of economic vulnerability and food insecurity (FI) with the Planetary Health Diet (PHD). Methods: This cross-sectional study included 378 children aged 8 to 9 years from Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Food consumption was assessed using 24-h dietary recalls, and adherence to the PHD was measured using the Planetary Health Diet Index (PHDI). Child and family sociodemographic characteristics were assessed using a semi-structured questionnaire. Food insecurity was evaluated using the Brazilian Food Insecurity Scale. Data were analyzed using adjusted linear regression models. Results: The mean PHDI score was low (37.5), indicating limited overall alignment with the PHD recommendations. Higher relative alignment with the PHDI scoring criteria was observed among children from more economically vulnerable households, including those living in poverty (≤US$5.50 per capita/day), with moderate or severe food insecurity, receiving government assistance, and in households with a higher number of residents. Moreover, poverty was associated with reduced consumption of animal-based foods, whole cereals, fruits, red and orange vegetables, and increased intake of affordable staples such as legumes and vegetable oils. Conclusion: While children in economically vulnerable households appeared to follow dietary patterns more relatively aligned with the PHD, it seems to be incidental, and likely reflects financial constraints due to economic hardship rather than active sustainability choices. Policymakers should interpret such adherence cautiously and prioritize equitable access to diverse, nutritious foods that align with both health and environmental goals. Further studies are needed to clarify how socioeconomic disparities shape relative adherence to the PHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.