ArticleBrain communications2026
Predictive value of foetal superior temporal sulcus asymmetry for neonatal speech discrimination.
Article in Brain communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While some anatomical brain asymmetries are seen across primates, the earlier appearance and larger depth of the right superior temporal sulcus (STS) is specific to human foetuses. Interestingly, the degree of STS asymmetry varies between foetuses, and it has been shown that this interindividual variability is related to the functional lateralization of the language network in school-aged children. It remains unclear, however, whether it is also indicative of language localization and functioning shortly after birth. In the present longitudinal study, we prospectively examined the predictive value of foetal STS asymmetry for neonates' language lateralization and neural speech discrimination. We measured the STS depths and volumes in neurotypical foetuses (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.