Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41768777›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2026

Physical performance and tactical experience: determinants of competition outcomes in amateur vs. elite cyclists - a descriptive study from the UCI tour of Lithuania.

Leonardo Cesanelli, Daniele Conte, Berta Ylaite, Bent R Rønnestad, Thomas Lagoute, Tomas Venckunas, Fabio Zambolin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Leonardo CesanelliInstitute of Sport Science and Innovations, Lithuanian Sports University, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Daniele ConteDepartment of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome "Foro Italico", Rome, Italy.
Berta YlaiteInstitute of Sport Science and Innovations, Lithuanian Sports University, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Bent R RønnestadSection for Health and Exercise Physiology, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Lillehammer, Norway.
Thomas LagouteDepartment of Sport Science and Physical Education, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.
Tomas VenckunasInstitute of Sport Science and Innovations, Lithuanian Sports University, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Fabio ZambolinDepartment of Sport and Exercise Sciences. Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this descriptive study was to compare laboratory and in-competition performance metrics between elite and amateur cyclists competing in the 2024 UCI Tour of Lithuania with respect to physical performance, racing approach, and tactical behavior. Methods: Two teams of five elite and five amateur cyclists completed laboratory tests 1 month before the event. Tests assessed peak oxygen uptake ( Results: Amateurs exhibited lower Discussion: Amateur cyclists demonstrated sufficient physical capacity to complete the Tour of Lithuania despite lower aerobic capacity and limited experience in team tactics. These findings illustrate the rising performance levels in amateur cycling while emphasizing persistent gaps in physical conditioning, race experience and execution, particularly in energy management, pacing strategies, and situational decision-making, factors that remain key competition-specific performance limitations compared to elite cyclists.

Indexed as

critical powercycling performanceendurancepower distributiontactical behavior

Identifiers

PMID41768777
PMCPMC12935623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.