ArticleACS omega2026
Foam Stability Evaluation of a Biodegradable Surfactant with Green Polymeric Stabilizers for Underbalanced Drilling Fluids.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Foam-based fluids are commonly used in underbalanced drilling (UBD) to reduce formation damage, enhance cuttings transport, and maintain pressure control in low-density drilling environments. However, their stability can be compromised under high-salinity and alkaline conditions typical of UBD operations. This study presents the formulation and evaluation of a simplified and environmentally friendly foam system based on a green, biodegradable surfactant (GreenSurf) combined with green stabilizers. Foam formulations were evaluated using a Dynamic Foam Analyzer (DFA) under ambient conditions with both air and nitrogen gas phases. A series of tests were conducted to identify the optimal surfactant concentration and screen stabilizer performance and to benchmark the optimized systems against a commercial multicomponent foam blend. Three water-soluble polymerspolyanionic cellulose (PAC), carboxymethyl cellulose sodium salts (CMC), and xanthan gum (XC)were assessed across different concentrations. Results showed that GreenSurf achieved optimal stability at 1.0 wt %. PAC consistently reduced foam half-life and was excluded from further optimization. CMC at 9 g/L and XC at 6 g/L significantly enhanced foam stability, reaching half-lives of 6473 and 15,969 s, respectively. Both polymer-enhanced systems outperformed the commercial blend in foam stability (5820 s) under the same test conditions. Liquid drainage analysis and structural imaging confirmed improved water retention and bubble cohesion in the optimized systems. The study offers a novel, sustainable approach to foam design by combining a biodegradable surfactant with green stabilizers and evaluating performance under chemically realistic UBD conditions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.