ReviewACS omega2026
Research Progress in Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Preparation of High-Quality Biomaterials.
Review in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineering Functional Biomaterials for Targeted and Localized Cancer Drug Delivery: A Structure-Property-Performance Design Perspective.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Metallic Orthopedic Implant Development: A Narrative Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Synchronizing degradation with regeneration: a model-driven framework for designing biodegradable biomaterials in bone tissue engineering.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2026Review
- Advanced Grafting Biomaterials and Technologies in Chronic Wound Care: Mechanisms, Clinical Outcomes, and Therapeutic Integration.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Multitechnological integration advances musculoskeletal regeneration: synergistic progress of organoids, 3D/4D bioprinting, single-cell omics and artificial intelligence.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The field of biomaterials development is undergoing a fundamental paradigm shift, moving from empirical, trial-and-error approaches to data-driven, intelligent design strategies powered by Artificial Intelligence (AI). This review systematically synthesizes recent progress in applying AI and Machine Learning (ML) technologies to the preparation of high-quality biomaterials. It begins by outlining core AI methodologiesincluding foundational learning paradigms and advanced architectures such as Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) and Transformersand discusses their alignment with specific types of biomaterials data. The article then details AI's transformative role across three critical stages of the biomaterials R&D pipeline: (1) precision prediction of properties via high-throughput screening and virtual data analysis; (2) inverse design driven by target performance requirements; and (3) rapid multiobjective optimization of both material formulations and synthesis process parameters. Illustrative case studies demonstrate how these AI-enhanced approaches significantly accelerate design efficiency, expand discovery space, and foster innovation. Furthermore, the review critically examines persistent challenges, such as data scarcity and heterogeneity, model interpretability and reliability, rigor in validation, and ethical-regulatory concerns. Finally, we present a forward-looking perspective on emerging directions, including the evolution toward autonomous intelligent design, end-to-end smart manufacturing, cross-disciplinary integrated applications, and a transition to sustainable development. The deep integration of AI is positioned to fundamentally accelerate the discovery, optimization, and clinical translation of next-generation, high-performance biomaterials for regenerative and precision medicine.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.