Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41768702›Full record

ReviewACS omega2026

Research Progress in Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Preparation of High-Quality Biomaterials.

De Wei, Ze Wang, Hao Lin, Xiao Ping Yin, Yi Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

De WeiDepartment of Law, College of Economics and Management; Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Mechanical & Energy Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China.
Ze WangDepartment of Law, College of Economics and Management; Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Mechanical & Energy Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China.
Hao LinDepartment of Law, College of Economics and Management; Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Mechanical & Energy Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China.
Xiao Ping YinDepartment of Radiology and Hebei Key Laboratory of Precise Imaging of Inflammation Related Tumors, Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Hebei International Joint Research Center for Digital Twin Diagnosis and Treatment of Digestive Tract Tumors, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding 071000, China.
Yi WangDepartment of Law, College of Economics and Management; Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Mechanical & Energy Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2540-0188

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of biomaterials development is undergoing a fundamental paradigm shift, moving from empirical, trial-and-error approaches to data-driven, intelligent design strategies powered by Artificial Intelligence (AI). This review systematically synthesizes recent progress in applying AI and Machine Learning (ML) technologies to the preparation of high-quality biomaterials. It begins by outlining core AI methodologiesincluding foundational learning paradigms and advanced architectures such as Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) and Transformersand discusses their alignment with specific types of biomaterials data. The article then details AI's transformative role across three critical stages of the biomaterials R&D pipeline: (1) precision prediction of properties via high-throughput screening and virtual data analysis; (2) inverse design driven by target performance requirements; and (3) rapid multiobjective optimization of both material formulations and synthesis process parameters. Illustrative case studies demonstrate how these AI-enhanced approaches significantly accelerate design efficiency, expand discovery space, and foster innovation. Furthermore, the review critically examines persistent challenges, such as data scarcity and heterogeneity, model interpretability and reliability, rigor in validation, and ethical-regulatory concerns. Finally, we present a forward-looking perspective on emerging directions, including the evolution toward autonomous intelligent design, end-to-end smart manufacturing, cross-disciplinary integrated applications, and a transition to sustainable development. The deep integration of AI is positioned to fundamentally accelerate the discovery, optimization, and clinical translation of next-generation, high-performance biomaterials for regenerative and precision medicine.

Identifiers

PMID41768702
PMCPMC12947018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.