ReviewACS omega2026
Decoding the Stability-Activity Paradox in Electrochemical Ammonia Oxidation: An Operando Perspective.
Review in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electrochemical ammonia oxidation reaction (AOR) offers a promising avenue to produce a sustainable energy conversion system through ammonia fuel cell electrolyzers and green hydrogen generation at lower overpotential. Recently, several homogeneous and heterogeneous catalytic systems have been explored to facilitate the ammonia oxidation process. However, its practical applicability is hindered by catalyst instability and degradation under harsh reaction conditions, such as high pH and high anodic potential. Certain associated challenges of electrochemical ammonia oxidation include metal dissolution, leaching, agglomeration-induced catalytic deactivation, and the strong affinity of nitrogenous intermediates with metal sites, leading to catalyst poisoning. Identification of such minute changes occurring at the metal active site or electrode-electrolyte interface requires sophisticated characterization techniques under experimental conditions. Here in this perspective article, we first discuss the mechanistic pathway of AOR, followed by a discussion on noble or non-noble metal-based electrocatalysts for AOR. This perspective critically investigates the central origin of catalyst deactivation during the ammonia oxidation process, thereby portraying the relationship between the coordination geometry, electronic structure, and surface sensitivity, which predominantly governs the electronic long-term stability and functional intensity. Then, various electrochemical in situ techniques, such as in situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS), Raman spectroscopy, and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), have been discussed for systematically studying the dynamic evolution of the active site, transient intermediates generated during AOR, and the local electronic and coordination structure of the catalyst. Finally, this perspective outlines future directions for the strategic synthesis of electrocatalysts, operando techniques, and durability engineering to propel the rational development of a sustainable and robust system for ammonia oxidation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.