ArticleACS omega2026
A Prospective and Cost-Effective Voltammetric-Chemometric Approach for the Discrimination and Quantification of Melamine and Urea in Milk.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this work, an analytical approach combining voltammetric detection with chemometric analysis was developed to discriminate melamine and urea adulterants in milk products. The electrochemical measurement was performed using a glassy carbon electrode (GCE) modified with acid-functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes (f-MWCNTs), which served as the working electrode to obtain the voltammetric fingerprint. This electrode was used to measure the voltammetric response of fresh cow milk adulterated with melamine and urea in 0.1 M KCl as the electrolyte by employing cyclic voltammetry (CV). Based on this result, milk adulterated with melamine and urea displayed broad peaks in the potential range of 0.6-0.8 V versus Ag/AgCl, attributable to the electroactive components in the adulterants and the milk. Additionally, it was found that milk adulterated with melamine exhibited several reduction peaks in the potential range from -0.4 to 0 V versus Ag/AgCl, corresponding to the reduction reaction of components present in melamine. Further chemometric analysis, i.e., principal component analysis, effectively distinguishes cow milk adulterated with melamine and urea. Moreover, the discrimination between cow's milk and its adulterants was successfully achieved using hierarchical cluster analysis, with the lowest melamine concentration detected at 0.24%. Quantitative estimates of milk adulterants were predicted using partial least-squares regression, as determined by root-mean-square error cross-validation (RMSECV), with melamine at 0.0755% and urea at 0.0064%. Therefore, this result demonstrates a promising, cost-effective analytical technique that can be further developed into a novel approach for detecting adulterants in dairy products for practical applications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.