ArticleACS omega2026
Study on Multifactor Regulation Mechanism and Priority of Gas Desorption in Soft Coal.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Under the background of global energy low-carbon transformation, coalbed methane (CBM) reserves in soft coal-rich areas such as China's Shanxi Qinshui Basin account for over 30% of the national total, yet the extraction efficiency has long been below 35%. The core bottleneck lies in insufficient understanding of the mechanisms by which multiple factors (e.g., temperature, moisture content, particle size, and initial pressure) regulate gas desorption, coupled with the lack of quantitative comparison and priority ranking. Taking soft coal from a coal mine in Shanxi Province, China, as the research object, this study conducted 16 groups of single-factor experiments (temperature: 10-40 °C, moisture content: 2%-8%, particle size: 0.3-4.0 mm, initial pressure: 1-4 MPa). Combined with high-precision monitoring and a quantitative evaluation system of "curve separation degree-peak rate range-attenuation constant range", the regulation laws, mechanisms, and priority order were revealed. Results show that initial pressure is the absolute dominant factor: the cumulative desorption amount at 4 MPa is 5.5 times that at 1 MPa, with a 6-fold difference in peak desorption rate. It determines gas reserves and desorption driving force through Langmuir adsorption equilibrium and pressure difference. Moisture content is a key inhibitory factor: the desorption amount at 8% decreases by 68.55% compared to 2%, showing a sharp decline in the 2%-4% range and a slow decline in the 4%-8% range, attributed to pore blockage and adsorption competition. Temperature is an auxiliary promoting factor: the desorption amount at 40 °C increases by 40% compared to 10 °C, regulating desorption by breaking adsorption equilibrium via Le Chatelier's principle and accelerating molecular thermal motion, but is constrained by moisture content. Particle size has the weakest impact: the difference in final desorption amount between coal samples of 0.3-0.5 mm and 2.0-4.0 mm is less than 5%, only assisting in regulating the initial rate. Quantitative comparison establishes the priority order: initial pressure > moisture content > temperature > particle size. This study fills the gap in quantitative comparison of multifactor effects, provides support for precise gas control strategies of ″pre-extraction pressure control-drainage dehumidification-temperature control assistance-local coal fragmentation", and is of great significance for improving CBM development efficiency and preventing gas disasters.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.