Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41768600›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)2026

Phantom limb telescoping in individuals with limb loss: links to anxiety, depression, and pain-related measures.

Andrea Aternali, Heather Lumsden-Ruegg, Lora Appel, Sander L Hitzig, Amanda L Mayo, Joel Katz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrea AternaliDepartment of Psychology, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Heather Lumsden-RueggDepartment of Psychology, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Lora AppelSchool of Health Policy & Management, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Sander L HitzigSt. John's Rehab Research Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Amanda L MayoSt. John's Rehab Research Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Joel KatzDepartment of Psychology, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phantom limb pain (PLP) and residual limb pain (RLP) have been widely studied following limb loss; however, the role of telescoping, the perceived shortening of the phantom limb, remains poorly understood in pain and psychosocial outcomes. Using a cross-sectional observational design, this study examined whether PLP and RLP intensity, pain interference, and psychosocial functioning differ between individuals who report telescoping and those who do not. Fifty-one adults with limb loss (mean age = 49.5 years, SD = 15.4) completed measures of PLP and RLP intensity (0-10 numeric rating scale), telescoping (presence and percent), pain interference (Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form), pain catastrophizing (Pain Catastrophizing Scale-4), neuropathic pain (ID Pain Questionnaire), pain acceptance (Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire-8), anxiety and depression symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-4), optimism (Life Orientation Test-Revised), and resilience (Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale-2). Twenty-three participants (45.1%) reported telescoping, while 28 (54.9%) did not. Telescoping was more common among younger participants and those with upper-limb loss, particularly right-sided below-elbow loss (all

Indexed as

limb lossphantom limb painpost-amputation painresidual limb paintelescoping

Identifiers

PMID41768600
PMCPMC12946000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.