ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2026
Mid-term performance of a unicompartmental knee prosthesis.
Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The objective of this study was to report midterm patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and survivorship of the Medacta MOTO Medial® Unicompartmental prosthesis ( Methods: This prospective, multicentre study included 207 adults aged 43-85. Of these, 170 reached 2-year and 90 reached 5-year follow-up. PROs included the forgotten joint score (FJS), Oxford knee score (OKS) and knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) subscales: Pain, Symptoms, ADL, Sport and QOL. Stress radiographs were divided into three types, quantifying the amount of medial space opening and deformity correction. Data were collected at preoperative, intraoperative, 4 weeks, 6 months, 1-year, 2-year and 5-year. Complications, revisions and Kaplan-Meier survivorship were analysed. Results: All PROs showed statistically significant improvements starting at 6 months and maintained through 5-year. Pre-operative standing full-length x-rays, averaged 6.5° varus. The average change in mechanical axis was less than 1° at 5-year. No difference in PROs was found between patients with ( Conclusion: Unicompartmental knee replacement with implant system that allows surgical flexibility and independent balancing is a surgical option with promise of excellent functional outcomes, low complication rates and high survivorship (98.1% at 5-year). These results challenge previous studies indicating high revision rates and support the utilisation of unicompartmental arthroplasty for properly indicated patients. Level of Evidence: Level II, prognostic studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.