ArticlePublic health challenges2026
Repositioning Global Health: Decolonising Narratives and Practice in the African Context.
Article in Public health challenges, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Global health practice in Africa remains shaped by enduring colonial legacies that privilege external expertise and undervalue indigenous knowledge systems. Despite widespread recognition of inequities in authorship, funding and representation, global health discourse often overlooks the deeper epistemic and cultural dimensions of decolonisation. Main Argument: This article argues that true decolonisation of global health requires dismantling the enduring mechanisms of coloniality, specifically epistemic injustice, misrepresentation and peripheral positioning, that continue to produce knowledge hierarchies and limit African autonomy. We propose a shift from a donor-recipient logic to a partnership logic, where African institutions and scholars lead in defining priorities and generating knowledge. Examples such as the widespread use of herbal and traditional medicine, often the first line of care for rural communities, illustrate how local innovations are frequently dismissed as unscientific rather than recognised as valuable health assets. Furthermore, the routine portrayal of deprived African communities in global health imagery perpetuates stereotypes that reinforce dependency. Conclusion: Decolonising global health in Africa demands not only fair authorship and funding practices but also epistemic inclusion and representational justice. Global health must be repositioned to leverage Africa's own resources, cultural practices and institutional capacities to create contextually grounded, equitable and sustainable health systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.