ArticlePublic health challenges2026
Lived Experiences of Deathcare Workers in Managing Infectious Dead Bodies.
Article in Public health challenges, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- On-site safety practices and knowledge in deathcare work: a phenomenological account of the lived-experiences of deathcare workers in Ghana.BMC health services research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Deathcare workers in resource-limited countries are chronically exposed to infectious diseases, mainly due to a lack of effective safety controls, inadequate resources, poor training and laxity on the part of industry managers. However, there is limited evidence from these countries, and very little is known about how deathcare workers manage infectious dead bodies. The aim of this study is to explore the experiences of deathcare workers involved in the management of infectious dead bodies in Ghana. Methods: Using purposive sampling, data were collected from 32 deathcare workers using 11-item semi-structured in-person interview guide. An observation checklist was also used to gather additional data on on-site safety practices. Thematic analysis was conducted using the realistic phenomenological approach. Results: We found that there were no clearly defined safety control systems (engineering, administrative and personal protective equipment supply and use) in place to protect workers against infectious diseases. For example, there were no separate storage facilities for infectious dead bodies. The workers were also exposed to various types of psychosocial hazards, such as heavy workload and dirty and disorganised work environments, which could affect their self-esteem, life satisfaction and coping skills. Additionally, these workers reported feeling humiliated, receiving poor remuneration and lacking opportunity for career progression. Conclusions: The deathcare workers in Ghana were not adequately prepared to handle infectious dead bodies, which put them at risk for infection and increased the psychosocial hazards at work. These workers may resort to unhealthy coping strategies, which require urgent attention. Future research should use qualitative approaches to investigate the working relationships between deathcare workers and their managers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.