ArticleFrontiers in allergy2026
Using machine learning to define mepolizumab treatment response at 2 years in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.
Article in Frontiers in allergy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recovery of Olfactory Function After Mepolizumab Treatment in Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps: Influence of the Number of Surgeries.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-assisted type 2 inflammatory endotyping in CRSwNP: from Sinus CT and digital pathology to biologic decision support.Frontiers in allergy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Using machine learning to identify clinical biomarkers for determining optimal response to mepolizumab in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Methods: Single center retrospective observational study with 84 CRSwNP patients treated with mepolizumab. We evaluated 4 machine learning algorithms: Decision Tree, Logistic Regression, K-Nearest Neighbors and Extreme Gradient Boosting. K-Fold cross-validation incorporating hyperparameter optimization in the process was used to ensure robustness and prevent overfitting. Results: After 6, 12 and 24 months, SNOT-22, VAS overall symptom score, VAS-smell, asthma control test (ACT) and nasal polyp score (NPS) significantly improved ( Conclusions: Machine learning models, particularly XGBoost, can predict real-world super-response to mepolizumab in severe CRSwNP by identifying key predictors like high baseline BEC, high baseline BNC and AERD comorbidity. These insights have the potential to refine CRSwNP treatment strategies and support clinical decision-making, ultimately enhancing patient outcomes by predicting treatment response prior to starting medication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.