ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2026
Assessing the Living Well in the Community Program for people with disabilities in the context of COVID-19.
Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Living Well in the Community (LWC) is a health promotion intervention developed by RTC:Rural to support people with disabilities in building self-management of health, well-being, and community engagement skills. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic and the need for remote access, LWC was adapted for online delivery. This study evaluates outcomes from the program's online implementation between 2020 and 2023. Methods: The online version of LWC was delivered over ten weekly sessions via Zoom-based meetings and a dedicated website. The study examined outcomes from participants ( Results: PROMIS scores showed insignificant improvements in behavioral health. However, participants reported a significant increase in hours spent on education, employment, or volunteering (from 7.42 to 11.13 h, Conclusion: While online delivery of LWC demonstrated reduced impact compared to prior in-person implementations, the program supported participants in maintaining stable health and engagement during a period of significant global disruption. While results were generally insignificant, they still suggest that online delivery of the LWC program may have been a valuable intervention for participants. Future research should investigate hybrid models and use larger sample sizes to assess program efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.