ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2026
Patient Reported Outcomes and Visual Acuity After Bilateral Implantation of a Next Generation Presbyopia Correcting Intraocular Lens.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Comparative Study of the Visual Outcomes of Two Common Diffractive Trifocal Intraocular Lenses in a Matched Cohort.Cureus · 2026Article
- Clinical Outcomes Following Bilateral Implantation of TECNIS Odyssey Intraocular Lenses in Japanese Eyes.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Clinical Outcomes Following Bilateral Implantation of a Next-Generation Intraocular Lens in Patients with Primary Open Angle Glaucoma.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Clinical outcomes of effectiveness and safety in cataract patients implanted with the novel hybrid extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens AM2UH: a prospective study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate 3-month postoperative outcomes for bilateral implantation of a next generation presbyopia correcting intraocular lens (IOL). Methods: This was a single center, ambispective study of visual outcomes after successful bilateral cataract surgery (with presbyopia-correcting intent) and TECNIS Odyssey implantation. Subjects were assessed 3 months postoperatively during a single visit. Clinical evaluations included measurement of visual acuities at distance, intermediate, near, and extreme near, and administration of the assessment of intraocular lens implant symptoms (AIOLIS) and ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaires. Results: A total of 40 subjects completed the study. Mean photopic binocular uncorrected visual acuities at 6 m, 66 cm, 40 cm, and 33 cm were -0.05 ± 0.06, 0.02 ± 0.12, 0.04 ± 0.10, and -0.02 ± 0.07 logMAR, respectively. The most commonly reported dysphotopsias (percentage of subjects experiencing them "Always") were halos at 32% (13/40), glare at night at 30% (12/40), and rings or spiderwebs at 18% (7/40). However, only 0% (0/40), 5% (2/40), and 2% (1/40) of subjects were "Extremely" bothered by halos, glare at night, and rings or spiderwebs, respectively. In addition, 80% (36/40) of subjects reported needing glasses "Not at all" or "A little of the time", and 100% (40/40) of subjects were satisfied with their vision. Conclusion: The results of this study suggest excellent visual outcomes at distance, intermediate, near, and extreme near, high spectacle independence, and high patient satisfaction with bilateral Odyssey implantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.