ArticleJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research
Transformer-based classification and interpretability of NR3C1 expression patterns in OSCC: Metabolic adaptation insights.
Article in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) involves several oncogenic proteins for survival. Protein sequence classification is a fundamental challenge in computational biology, complicated by the complex, non-linear relationships within sequences. Recent advances in transformer-based language models have yielded promising results on biological sequence tasks. The study involves a comprehensive evaluation of four transformer models, compared with two deep learning models and two traditional machine learning classifiers (Random Forest and SVM), for protein sequence classification of NR3C1 peptide sequences. Methods: All models were trained for 100 epochs on 5 UniProt sequences, split into medium (200-500 aa) and long (>500 aa) classes. Sequences were tokenized, padded, or truncated to 512 tokens, and converted for BERT, RoBERTa, DistilBERT, and ALBERT. The dataset was split into 80% for training and 20% for validation, with stratified class balance. Results: Among the four transformer models, RoBERTa performed best with an F1-score of 0.8574, followed by ALBERT and BERT with scores of 0.8509 and 0.8378, respectively. These models performed far better than the deep learning models, which had an F1-score of approximately 0.763, and the traditional methods, which had an F1-score of 0.693. ALBERT achieved approximately 99.2% of RoBERTa's performance while using only about 9.6% of its parameters. Overall, RoBERTa and other transformers yield the best-performing models for protein sequence classification. Conclusion: Transformer models, especially RoBERTa, outperform conventional methods for NR3C1 protein sequence classification, achieving higher accuracy and efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.