ReviewJournal of the Saudi Heart Association2026
Anthracyclines and the Heart: A Double-edged Sword With Therapeutic Hopes.
Review in Journal of the Saudi Heart Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Metabolic reprogramming in radiation-induced heart disease: the emerging role of PET imaging.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Anthracyclines, notably doxorubicin, are potent cytotoxic agents that substantially improved outcomes across numerous malignancies. However, their use is restricted by their cardiotoxicity, a dose-dependent adverse effect that manifests acutely, during treatment, or years post-therapy. It encompasses a spectrum of phenotypes including asymptomatic ventricular dysfunction, heart failure, arrhythmias, and cardiomyopathy, contributing to considerable morbidity and mortality as cancer survival rates improve. Objective: This narrative review summarises current insights into anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity pathophysiology and evaluates pharmacologic strategies for its prevention and management. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted through August 2025, prioritizing randomised controlled trials, meta-analyses, observational studies, and guideline statements addressing pharmacologic interventions to mitigate anthracycline cardiotoxicity. Results: Anthracycline cardiotoxicity arises from various mechanisms, including oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, topoisomerase IIβ-induced DNA damage, calcium dysregulation, and reticulum stress. Neurohormonal modulation with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, and β-blockers has shown modest preservation of left ventricular ejection fraction, especially when initiated early in high-risk patients; spironolactone appears more effective than eplerenone among mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. Sacubitril/valsartan demonstrates promising superiority in preclinical and early clinical cohorts, though further randomised control trials are ongoing. Metabolic modulators such as metformin and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors exhibit cardio-protectivity via AMPK activation, attenuation of oxidative and inflammatory pathways, but evidence in non-diabetic cancer populations is limited. Statins have shown reduced left ventricular ejection fraction decline and lower cardiotoxicity rates in randomised studies, while dexrazoxane-through iron chelation and topoisomerase IIβ inhibition-remains the only approved agent for anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity prevention, strongly supported by adult and paediatric data. Conclusion: Several pharmacologic strategies offer potential benefit in limiting anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity and preserving cardiac function. Tailored, risk-based approaches that incorporate cardioprotective therapies early in anthracycline treatment-guided by biomarkers and imaging-are most promising. Further large-scale randomised studies are required to establish optimal combinations and confirm long-term benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.