ReviewFrontiers in medical technology2026
Early and accelerated access programs for medical devices in the European Union: mapping regulatory derogations and national schemes.
Review in Frontiers in medical technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rebalancing innovation, affordability, and access for orphan drugs in the European Union.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026Review
- Wearable Biosensors for Continuous Monitoring of Chronic Kidney Disease: Materials, Biofluids, and Digital Health Integration.Biosensors · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Early access programs (EAPs) can provide patients with medical devices before full market access in urgent or high unmet-need situations. Unlike pharmaceuticals, the European Union (EU) has no harmonised early-access framework for medical devices, resulting in fragmented national practices. We use Methods: We conducted a qualitative document-based analysis of peer-reviewed literature, grey literature (policy papers, regulatory guidance), and legal sources (EU legislation, national laws) published up to June 2025. We searched PubMed and Google Scholar, consulted Eur-Lex, and reviewed national competent authority websites. Search terms (English and local languages, then translated) combined "medical device" with "early access," "accelerated access," "compassionate use," and "derogation," plus "EU" or MS names. Documents were included if they described mechanisms enabling early use of medical devices. We synthesised and compared key program characteristics. Results: We identified early and accelerated access pathways at EU level and within MS. EU law provides derogations from CE-marking requirements, notably Article 59 of the EU Medical Device Regulation (EU MDR), allowing national authorisation of non-CE-marked devices in exceptional circumstances. The EU MDR also enables the use of custom-made devices and certain in-house manufactured devices by health institutions without full CE marking. Nationally, at least half of MS operate compassionate or expanded access schemes for devices, and some implement reimbursement or evidence-development mechanisms (e.g., France's Conclusions: Early access to medical devices in Europe relies on EU regulatory derogations and heterogeneous national schemes. The landscape remains fragmented and unevenly documented. We recommend: (1) a more structured EU-level route for high-risk and combination products, (2) lifecycle-based national schemes integrating regulatory and payer access, (3) measures to reduce inequities and administrative barriers, particularly in Central and Eastern Europe, and (4) improved transparency and standardised data collection on implemented pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.