ArticlePublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2026
How can integrated neighbourhood teams (INTs) tackle health and care inequalities? A policy evidence brief.
Article in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The policy challenge: Tackling health inequalities requires sustained, multi-sectoral collaboration across health care, social care, and local and national authorities. Integrated neighbourhood teams (INTs) are increasingly discussed as a key component of an integrated strategy which can increase equity in health and health care - these involve micro-integration of health and care at the neighbourhood level. However, despite their potential, there is currently no evidence-informed approach guiding their design, implementation, and evaluation in relation to health inequalities. Key evidence to inform policy: There are four key principles for designing and delivering INTs to maximise their impact on reducing health inequalities: 1) locally sensitive, autonomous, and needs-based approaches, 2) trust between health care services and disadvantaged communities, 3) accessible, co-located, multi-sector services for disadvantaged groups, 4) integrated IT systems and information governance. Further considerations and implications: Further research is needed to establish a robust, equity-focused framework for the implementation and evaluation of INTs. Policy makers and health care leaders should focus on ensuring funding allocation according to local need, fostering community partnerships, co-locating health and social care services, and standardising IT systems and information governance to maximise the potential of INTs to reduce health inequalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.