Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41768244›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026

Assessing the robustness and clinical evaluation of a deep-learning segmentation model for head and neck cancer.

Daniel H Schanne, Léandre Cuenot, Sarah Brüningk, Mauricio Reyes, Olgun Elicin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniel H Schanne *Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Léandre Cuenot *ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Sarah BrüningkDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Mauricio Reyes *Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Olgun Elicin *Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: Deep learning (DL)-based autosegmentation has improved delineation of organs at risk in radiotherapy for head and neck cancer (HNC). However, automated segmentation of gross tumor volumes (GTVp, GTVn) remains challenging, and robustness under real-world imaging conditions is insufficiently characterized. This study evaluates the robustness and clinical usability of a DL-based PET/CT segmentation model for HNC under clinically relevant perturbations. Materials and methods: A 3D Dynamic U-Net was trained on the public HECKTOR 2022 dataset (474 training, 50 test cases). Synthetic perturbations (noise, blur, ghosting, bias-field, spike noise, and motion) were applied to PET and CT images at varying severity levels, generating 36 variants per patient. Segmentation quality was measured using Dice score, Hausdorff Distance, and accuracy. Clinical usability was assessed for 50 baseline and 18 perturbed cases by two clinicians using a five-point Likert scale. Radiomic features were correlated with robustness metrics. Results: Baseline Dice scores were 0.766 (GTVp) and 0.698 (GTVn). Performance dropped significantly under spike noise and bias-field artifacts, especially for GTVn. Clinical usability remained high for GTVp (77.8%) but declined to 27.9% for GTVn under severe perturbations. Lesion volume and surface complexity positively correlated with robustness degradation, while high PET contrast offered protective effects against certain perturbations. Conclusion: DL-based PET/CT segmentation models for HNC show strong baseline performance and robustness for primary tumors. However, nodal tumor segmentation remains vulnerable to specific image artifacts. Enhancing robustness through targeted data augmentation and validation under variable conditions is essential for clinical integration.

Indexed as

autosegmentationdeep learninghead and neck cancerPET/CTrobustness

Identifiers

PMID41768244
PMCPMC12945774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.