ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Clinical outcomes of boron neutron capture therapy for unresectable oral cancer: a retrospective analysis.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Re-irradiation using boron neutron capture therapy for recurrent oral squamous cell carcinoma: the impact of tumor volume and early response on survival.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Surgery is the standard treatment for oral cancer but often causes functional and cosmetic problems, and reoperation is difficult. Radiotherapy (RT) is less effective, with reirradiation limited by normal tissue tolerance and salvage surgery after RT carrying high complication risks. Systemic therapy is used for local recurrence but yields poor outcomes, underscoring the need for better options. Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) is an established method that selectively delivers high tumor doses. This study evaluated BNCT efficacy and safety in unresectable oral cancers not amenable to definitive RT. Methods: This retrospective study included oral cancer patients treated with BNCT between June 2020 and June 2024 under the Japanese public health insurance system. Primary endpoints were best treatment response and incidence of adverse events (AEs), particularly severe oral mucositis (Grade ≥ 3 by Common Terminology Criteria for AEs version 5). Predictors of severe oral mucositis were also examined. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), locoregional control (LRC), and progression free survival (PFS). Results: Among 74 patients (follow-up period ≥3 months), the majority (73%) had recurrent cancer. The complete response rate was 50%. The major severe acute AE was severe oral mucositis (all Grade 3) in 26% of patients. The maximum oral mucosal dose and the number of dental metals were significant predictors of severe oral mucositis. The 2-year OS, LRC, and PFS rates were 49%, 52%, and 29%, respectively. Conclusion: This study suggests that BNCT is an effective and safe treatment for unresectable oral cancers that cannot be definitively irradiated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.