ReviewMedical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina)2025
Whole-Exome Sequencing in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: Current Evidence and Future Directions in Saudi Arabia.
Review in Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Recurrent pregnancy loss or RPL is a controversial subject in reproductive medicine. Although we perform clinical tests and cytogenetic analyses, we are often left puzzled. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) is changing this trend, whose usage has helped discover inherited and new genetic changes related to miscarriage. Objective: This review summarizes international experience of using WES in RPL diagnostics and genetics, particularly from Saudi Arabia and other consanguineous populations. Methods: Based on PRISMA protocols, database searches were performed in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science for published studies (2013 to 2025). There were 24 studies in total of women or couples with RPL which is due two or more consecutive losses with WES. Afterward, we sought information on the study design, participants, how WES was performed, its diagnostic yield, the genes involved, and the clinical implications. Studies from Saudi Arabia were evaluated in more detail. Results: A diagnostic yield of 34.9% was observed across these studies. A total of 24 studies with 585 families and 5,000 pregnancy losses. increasing further in trio-based WES designs. More than 60 genes were found that not only are responsible but also likely to contribute to RPL. Maternal effects, cilia development, immune tolerance, and blood coagulation-endocrine functions. Most cases were of autosomal-recessive mode of inheritance, particularly in consanguineous groups from Saudi Arabia and South Asia. European populations, however, were shown to have a more abundant de novo variants. In Saudi Arabia, genomic research has contributed significantly toward identifying novel maternal-effect and early embryonic genes that highlight the necessity of population-specific genomic data. Conclusion: WES is transforming the diagnosis of RPL by unveiling rare monogenic and oligogenic causes that would otherwise be missed by standard testing. The application of WES in reproductive health care facilitates counselling, PGTM and targeted carrier screening. These approaches can possibly improve outcomes and increase live births. The evidence from Saudi Arabia and other consanguineous populations suggests added advantages in the consanguineous context and points to ways that genomic medicine can aid reproductive choices. Future research should include functional validation of candidate variants, the use of AI-based tools for variant interpretation, and the establishment of global registries to promote equitable and population-informed genomics for future purposes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.