SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2026
Moral decision-making in patients with neurodegenerative diseases: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Moral decision-making, a core component of social cognition, relies on integrating affective and cognitive processes supported by distributed neural networks. Neurodegenerative diseases disrupt these systems to varying degrees, offering unique models to investigate the neural bases of moral cognition. This review aimed to systematically examine moral decision-making deficits across neurodegenerative diseases, delineate disease-specific patterns of moral cognition impairment, and highlight conceptual and methodological gaps to inform future research and clinical assessment. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus was conducted for studies published up to January 2025, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines. Results: Seventeen studies met inclusion criteria. Convergent evidence indicates that behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) produces a distinctive utilitarian bias characterized by diminished empathy, emotional blunting, and impaired integration of intention and outcome, reflecting degeneration of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, anterior insula, and amygdala within the salience and default mode networks. In contrast, Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients typically preserve affective aversion to harm, suggesting relative sparing of limbic-ventromedial circuits despite conceptual and executive decline. Moral reasoning in Parkinson's disease (PD) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) remains largely intact unless frontotemporal involvement occurs, while dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) manifests intermediate profiles marked by reduced cognitive theory of mind and aberrant moral affect. Discussion: These findings delineate disease-specific patterns of moral dysfunction linked to network-level degeneration rather than global cognitive decline. Understanding these mechanisms holds translational relevance for early diagnosis, ethical capacity assessment, and the development of ecologically valid tools to monitor socio-emotional deterioration in neurodegenerative disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.