ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
In to the feeling: doctoral students' academic emotional experiences and regulation.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The process of doctoral students engaging in academic research involves a series of positive and negative academic-related emotional experiences, to cope with the change in emotional states, the use of emotional regulation strategies is encouraged. Although inseparable, few scholars have linked the two for explorations. This study explored Chinese doctoral students' academic emotional experiences and the corresponding emotional regulation strategies, especially the potential links. Methods: A total of 15 in-depth interviews were applied to encode and interpret the emotional context of doctoral students. The analytic process was informed by a qualitative interpretive paradigm according to the operation steps of the grounded theory. Results: The study found that Ph.D. students reported mixed emotions in doctoral programs and supervisor-student interactions, and evident negative emotions in academic writing and academic environment. Furthermore, four emotional regulation strategies were identified to cope with changes in emotional states linked to academic emotional experiences: presupposition, cognitive conversion, restraining, and physiological modulation. Discussion: The study explores the emotional experience characteristics and emotion regulation strategies of doctoral students throughout their academic period. Links between academic emotional experiences and emotional regulation are highlighted from both relational and context-level perspectives. This not only fills the gap in the study of the relationship between academic emotion experiences and regulation, but also provides a practical basis for reforming doctoral training in terms of ways and environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.