Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41768146›Full record

ArticleBJR open2026

Optimal time for MRI response evaluation in squamous cell carcinoma of the anus.

Bettina A Hanekamp, Ellen Viktil, Johann Baptist Dormagen, Nils E Kløw, Cathrine Brunborg, Eirik Malinen, Marianne G Guren, Anselm Schulz

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJR open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01937780 (Anal Cancer Radiotherapy - Prospective Study of Treatment Outcome, Patient-Reported Outcomes, Utility of Imaging and Biomarkers, and Cancer Survivorship), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01937780 active not recruitingnot on this map

Anal Cancer Radiotherapy - Prospective Study of Treatment Outcome, Patient-Reported Outcomes, Utility of Imaging and Biomarkers, and Cancer Survivorship

TypeobservationalSponsorOslo University HospitalRan2013 to 2025Enrolled75ConditionsAnal Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bettina A HanekampInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, 0318 Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3094-6548
Ellen ViktilInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, 0318 Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7140-2440
Johann Baptist DormagenDepartment of Radiology, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9781-4400
Nils E KløwInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, 0318 Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6042-402X
Cathrine BrunborgOslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9050-2968
Eirik MalinenDepartment of Physics, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1308-9871
Marianne G GurenInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, 0318 Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0593-0218
Anselm SchulzInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, 0318 Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7406-5497

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To identify the optimal time for MRI response evaluation after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) and to employ combined T2+diffusion-weighted MRI tumour regression grade (comrTRG). Methods: We assessed the positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) of post-treatment MRI in a retrospective mono-centre diagnostic accuracy study that prospectively included consecutive patients treated between 2013 and 2017. Index tests were MRI at 6-, 12-, and 24-weeks post-treatment (6w, 12w, and 24w) to detect locoregional treatment failures (LRTF). Clinical outcome served as reference standard. Tumour regression was assessed using comrTRG based on radiological reports. Mixed-effects logistic regression was used to compare the comrTRG score across time points. The analyses were stratified by patients' T/N stage and human papillomavirus (HPV) status. Results: For 127 included patients (62 years ± 11 [mean ± SD]; 92 women), 261 post-treatment MRI reports (6w: Conclusions: MRI performed more reliably after 24 weeks. Timely assessment may aid early LRTF detection. Tailoring follow-up with frequent MRI scans may be sufficient for high-risk patients. Combined mrTRG is practical for describing response in SCCA. Advances in knowledge: Post-treatment MRI assessment at later time points is preferable in SCCA to avoid inconclusive imaging and unnecessary salvage surgery. The introduced comrTRG is a practical tool for response evaluation. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01937780.

Indexed as

anal cancerchemoradiotherapydiffusion magnetic resonance imagingresponse assessmenttreatment failure

Identifiers

PMID41768146
PMCPMC12947585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.