Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41768135›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026

Jiayuan Zhang, Yufan Chen, Xingru Tao, Kaihang Zhang, Chunfeng Xu, Dedong Yu

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jiayuan ZhangSecond Dental Center, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong university School of Medicine, College of Stomatology, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Yufan ChenStomatology Hospital, School of Stomatology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedical, Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Devices of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Xingru TaoSecond Dental Center, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong university School of Medicine, College of Stomatology, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Kaihang ZhangDepartment of Engineering Mechanics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Chunfeng XuSecond Dental Center, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong university School of Medicine, College of Stomatology, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Dedong YuSecond Dental Center, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong university School of Medicine, College of Stomatology, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Adequate bone volume and contour are essential for successful implant placement. This study evaluated the accuracy of a novel self-positioning three-dimensional printed individualized titanium mesh (3D-PITM) in guided bone regeneration (GBR). Methods: Ten identical maxillary phantoms with standardized defects were divided into an experimental self-positioning 3D-PITM group and a conventional 3D-PITM group. Pre- and postoperative CBCT scans were obtained for 3D reconstruction and superimposition. Deviations in augmented contours, screw placement, volumetric accuracy, and 2D cross-sectional augmentation were analyzed. Results: The self-positioning group showed significantly reduced deviation in augmentation contours (0.82 ± 0.07 mm vs. 1.02 ± 0.13 mm, Conclusion: The self-positioning 3D-PITM achieved more accurate installation and predictable bone augmentation

Indexed as

dental implantologydimensional accuracyguided bone regeneration (GBR)individualized titanium meshin vitroevaluationself-positioning design

Identifiers

PMID41768135
PMCPMC12946736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.