ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026
Using swin UNETR deep model for automated detection of alveolar bone fenestration/dehiscence in CBCT.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to develop a deep learning-based model for the automatic detection of fenestration and dehiscence in Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) images, providing a quantitative tool for diagnosing alveolar bone defects. Methods: Utilizing 10,752 manually annotated sagittal CBCT dental images, the Shifted Window Transformer U-Net (Swin UNETR) model was trained to automatically measure and diagnose fenestration and dehiscence. Model performance was evaluated based on key point localization accuracy, length measurement accuracy, and disease detection performance. Heatmaps were employed for visual identification of disease locations. Results: The Swin UNETR model achieved key point recognition rates of 92.97%-99.09% for fenestration and dehiscence. Predicted lengths for all defect sites showed strong correlation with actual measurements. Disease diagnosis accuracy ranged from 0.8228 to 0.9476. The model demonstrated robust performance in key point identification, defect length quantification, and disease diagnosis. Conclusion: The deep learning model enables precise localization and quantitative measurement of fenestration and dehiscence in CBCT images. This approach enhances diagnostic efficiency and accuracy in detecting fenestration and dehiscence, facilitating preoperative orthodontic risk assessment and personalized treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.